Sample Disclosure – Accounting Policy Of Concesssion Contracts (26 November 2010)

Concession contracts

A substantial portion of the Group’s assets are created and used due to concession contracts granted by public sector customers (‘grantors’) and/or by concession companies purchased by the Group on full or partial privatisation. The characteristics of these contracts vary significantly depending on the country and activity concerned. Nonetheless, they generally provide, directly or indirectly, for the grantors’ involvement in the determination of the service and its charges levied on users, and the return of the assets necessary to carry out the performance of the service at the end of the contract to the grantors concerned. In order to fall within the definition of concession contracts, a contract must satisfy the following two criteria:

  • the grantor controls or regulates what services the operator must provide with the type of the infrastructure required, the users of the services, and at an agreed price; and
  • the grantor controls the residual interest in the infrastructure at the end of the term of the arrangement.

Such infrastructure is not recognised in the balance sheet of the Group as property, plant and equipment but as financial assets (under ‘financial asset model’) and/or intangible assets (under ‘intangible asset model’) depending on the remuneration commitments given by the grantor.

Financial asset model

The financial asset model applies when the Group has an unconditional right to receive cash or another financial asset from the grantor.

In the case of concession services, the Group have such an unconditional right if the grantor contractually guarantees the payment of:

  • amounts specified or determined in the contract or
  • the shortfall, if any, between amounts received from users of the public service and amounts specified or determined in the contract.

Financial assets from the application of this policy are recorded in the balance sheet under the heading ‘Operating financial assets’ and recognised at amortised cost. Unless otherwise indicated in the contract, the effective interest rate is equal to the weighted average cost of capital of the entities carrying the assets concerned.

An impairment loss is recognised if the carrying amount of these assets exceeds the fair value, as estimated during impairment tests. Fair value is estimated based on the recoverable amount, calculated by discounting future cash flows (value in use method).

The portion falling due within less than one year is presented in the balance sheet as ‘Operating financial assets’ under current assets heading, while the portion falling due within more than one year is presented in the non-current assets heading.

Revenue associated with financial model includes:

  • revenue determined on completion basis in the case of construction operating financial assets;
  • the remuneration of the operating financial asset recorded in revenue from operating financial assets (excluding principal payments);
  • Remuneration from services rendered to users

Intangible asset model

The intangible asset model applies where the operator is paid by the users or where the concession grantor has not provided a contractual guarantee in respect of the amount recoverable. The intangible asset corresponds to the right granted by the concession grantor to the operator to charge users of the public service.

Intangible assets resulting from the application of this policy are recorded in the Balance Sheet under the heading ‘Concession intangible assets’ and are amortised, generally on a straight-line basis, over the contract term. However, fees paid to local authorities that are part of intangible costs are disclosed under item ‘Other intangible assets’.

Under the intangible asset model, Revenue includes:

  • revenue from the construction of the infrastructure;
  • operating revenue of the infrastructure.

Mixed model

The choice of the financial asset or intangible asset model depends on the existence of payment guarantees granted by the concession grantor. However, certain contracts may include a payment commitment on the part of the concession grantor covering only part of the investment, with the balance covered by royalties charged to users.

Where this is the case, the investment amount guaranteed by the concession grantor is recognised under the financial asset model and the residual balance is recognised under the intangible asset model.

Sample Disclosure – Accounting Policy Of Operating Segments Reporting (25 November 2010)

Operating Segments Reporting

Operating segments are reported in a manner consistent with the internal reporting provided to the chief operating decision-maker of the Group. The chief operating decision-maker of the Group, who is responsible for allocating resources and assessing performance of the operating segments, is the Chief Operating Officer (“COO”) of the Group who has the authority to make strategic decisions on the operations of the Group.

Sample Disclosure – Change In Accounting Policy Due To Early Adoption Of FRS 4 Insurance Contracts (23 November 2010)

Early Adoption of FRSs and Amendments to FRSs

During the financial year, the Group early adopted FRS 4 Insurance Contracts in accordance with the transitional provisions require simultaneous adoption of Financial Guarantee Contracts (Amendments to IAS 39 and IFRS 4) issued by the International Accounting Standards Board (“IASB”) in August 2005. This pronouncement permits the accounting policy choice of scoping financial guarantee contracts in accordance with FRS 139 Financial Instruments: Recognition and Measurement, or as insurance contracts in accordance with FRS 4.

The disclosure requirements in FRS 4 need not apply to comparative information that relates to annual periods beginning before 1 January 2010.

Consequently, the Group designates corporate guarantees given to banks for credit facilities granted to subsidiaries as insurance contracts as defined in FRS 4. The Group recognises these insurance contracts as recognised insurance liabilities when there is a present obligation, legal or constructive, as a result of a past event, when it is probable that an outflow of resources embodying economic benefits will be required to settle the obligation and a reliable estimate can be made of the amount of the obligation.

At every reporting date, the Group shall assess whether its recognised insurance liabilities are adequate, using current estimates of future cash flows under its insurance contracts. If this assessment shows that the carrying amount of the insurance liabilities is inadequate, the entire deficiency shall be recognised in income statement.

Recognised insurance liabilities shall only be removed from the balance sheet when and only when, it is extinguished via a discharge, cancellation or expiration.

The early adoption of FRS 4 does not result in any adjustment to recognised items of assets, liabilities, income and expense of the Group in both, the current year and prior years. Financial guarantees of the Company are disclosed in Note XX to the financial statements.

Sample Disclosure – Change In Accounting Policy, Measurement Of Stage Of Completion Of Contract Work (8 December 2009)

CHANGE IN ACCOUNTING POLICY – MEASUREMENT OF STAGE OF COMPLETION FOR CONTRACT WORK

Prior to 1 July 2008, where the outcome of a construction contract can be reliably estimated, contract revenue and contract costs are recognised as revenue and expenses respectively by using the stage of completion method. The stage of completion is measured by reference to the proportion of contract costs incurred for work performed to date to the estimated total contract costs.

However, the Company has changed the basis of measurement from proportion of contract costs incurred for work performed to date to the estimated total contract costs to survey of work performed. The reason for the change is that the directors are of the opinion that value of work certified or surveyed as a percentage of the total contract value better reflect the contract work performed by the Company. The change in accounting policy is applied retrospectively and there was no effect on the balance sheet items of the Company as at 30 June 2009 and the income statement of the Company for the financial year then ended.

Sample Auditors’ Report To Controller Of Housing Pursuant To Section 9(3) Of Housing Developers (Control of Licensing) Act 1966 (3 December 2009)

INDEPENDENT AUDITORS’ REPORT TO THE CONTROLLER OF HOUSING PURSUANT TO SECTION 9(3) OF THE HOUSING DEVELOPMENT (CONTROL OF LICENSING) ACT 1966        

ABC SDN. BHD. (123456-X)

 (Incorporated in Malaysia)

Report on the Financial Statements

We have audited the financial statements of ABC SDN. BHD. which comprise the balance sheets as at 31 March 2009 of the Company, and the income statements, statements of changes in equity and cash flow statements of the Company for the year then ended, and a summary of significant accounting policies and other explanatory notes, as set out on pages X to XX.

Directors’ Responsibility for the Financial Statements

The directors of the Company are responsible for the preparation and fair presentation of these financial statements in accordance with Accounting Standards for Private Entities and the Housing Development (Control and Licensing) Act, 1966 in Malaysia. This responsibility includes: designing, implementing and maintaining internal control relevant to the preparation and fair presentation of financial statements that are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error; selecting and applying appropriate accounting policies; and making accounting estimates that are reasonable in the circumstances.

Auditors’ Responsibility

Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audit. We conducted our audit in accordance with approved standards on auditing in Malaysia. Those standards require that we comply with ethical requirements and plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance whether the financial statements are free from material misstatement.

An audit involves performing procedures to obtain audit evidence about the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. The procedures selected depend on our judgment, including the assessment of risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to fraud or error. In making those risk assessments, we consider internal control relevant to the entity’s preparation and fair presentation of the financial statements in order to design audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the entity’s internal control. An audit also includes evaluating the appropriateness of accounting policies used and the reasonableness of accounting estimates made by the directors, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements.

We believe that the audit evidence we have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our audit opinion.

Opinion

In our opinion:

a)       the financial statements have been properly drawn up in accordance with the provisions of the Housing Development (Control and Licensing) Act, 1966 and Private Entity Reporting Standards in Malaysia, so as to give a true and fair view of the financial position of the Company as at 31 March 2009 and of the results of the operations, the cash flows and changes in equity for the financial year ended on that date; and

b)       the accounting and other records required by Housing Development (Control and Licensing) Act, 1966 to be kept have been properly kept in accordance with the provisions of the said and Act;        

c)       we have received satisfactory explanations and information from the officers and agents of the Company for the purpose of our audit.

Report on Other Legal and Regulatory Requirements

In accordance with the requirements of the Companies Act, 1965 in Malaysia, we also report that in our opinion the accounting and other records and the registers required by the Act to be kept by the Company have been properly kept in accordance with the provisions of the Act.

Other Matters

This report is made solely to the Controller of Housing pursuant to Section 9(3) of the Housing Developers (Control of Licensing) Act 1966 and for no other purpose. We do not assume responsibility to any other person for the content of this report.

 

DEF & Co.

No. AF: 123

Chartered Accountants

 

 

Awang Bin Malek

No. 123/10/10 (J/PH)

Partner

Wonderland

Dated: 2 December 2009