Sample Disclosure – Note On Significant Event During The Year On Affected Listed Issuer Status (1 December 2010)

Significant Event – Affected Listed Issuer Status

Pursuant to the Listing Requirements (“LR”) of Bursa Malaysia Securities Berhad (“Bursa Securities”) in relation to the Amended Practice Note No. 17/2005 (“PN 17”), the Company had on 20 February 2009 announced that it is deemed an Affected Listed Issuer as defined in PN 17 as the Group and the Company have defaulted in their interest payments as announced in pursuant to Practice Note No. 1/2001 (“PN 1”).

As an Affected Listed Issuer, the Company is required to comply with the following obligations pursuant to paragraph 3.1 (a)(ii) of the Amended PN17:

a)    To announce details of the regularisation plan as referred to in paragraph 8.14C(3) of the Listing Requirements and the announcement must fulfil the requirements set out in paragraph 3.1A of the Amended PN17/2005;

b)    To submit the regularisation plan to Bursa Securities and other relevant authorities (“Approving Authorities”), for approval within eight months from the date of the announcement; and to implement the regularisation plan within the time frame stipulated by the relevant Approving Authority;

c)    To announce the status of its plan to regularise its condition and the number of months to the relevant timeframes referred thereto, as  may be applicable, on a monthly basis until further notice from Bursa Securities; and

d)    To announce its compliance or non-compliance with a particular obligation imposed pursuant to the Amended PN17/2005 on an immediate basis.

In the event that the Company fails to comply with the obligation to regularise its condition, all its listed securities shall be suspended from trading from the 5th market day after the submission time frame or implementation time frame, as the case may be, and delisting procedures shall be taken against the Company by Bursa Securities.

Sample Disclosure – Accounting Policy Of Concesssion Contracts (26 November 2010)

Concession contracts

A substantial portion of the Group’s assets are created and used due to concession contracts granted by public sector customers (‘grantors’) and/or by concession companies purchased by the Group on full or partial privatisation. The characteristics of these contracts vary significantly depending on the country and activity concerned. Nonetheless, they generally provide, directly or indirectly, for the grantors’ involvement in the determination of the service and its charges levied on users, and the return of the assets necessary to carry out the performance of the service at the end of the contract to the grantors concerned. In order to fall within the definition of concession contracts, a contract must satisfy the following two criteria:

  • the grantor controls or regulates what services the operator must provide with the type of the infrastructure required, the users of the services, and at an agreed price; and
  • the grantor controls the residual interest in the infrastructure at the end of the term of the arrangement.

Such infrastructure is not recognised in the balance sheet of the Group as property, plant and equipment but as financial assets (under ‘financial asset model’) and/or intangible assets (under ‘intangible asset model’) depending on the remuneration commitments given by the grantor.

Financial asset model

The financial asset model applies when the Group has an unconditional right to receive cash or another financial asset from the grantor.

In the case of concession services, the Group have such an unconditional right if the grantor contractually guarantees the payment of:

  • amounts specified or determined in the contract or
  • the shortfall, if any, between amounts received from users of the public service and amounts specified or determined in the contract.

Financial assets from the application of this policy are recorded in the balance sheet under the heading ‘Operating financial assets’ and recognised at amortised cost. Unless otherwise indicated in the contract, the effective interest rate is equal to the weighted average cost of capital of the entities carrying the assets concerned.

An impairment loss is recognised if the carrying amount of these assets exceeds the fair value, as estimated during impairment tests. Fair value is estimated based on the recoverable amount, calculated by discounting future cash flows (value in use method).

The portion falling due within less than one year is presented in the balance sheet as ‘Operating financial assets’ under current assets heading, while the portion falling due within more than one year is presented in the non-current assets heading.

Revenue associated with financial model includes:

  • revenue determined on completion basis in the case of construction operating financial assets;
  • the remuneration of the operating financial asset recorded in revenue from operating financial assets (excluding principal payments);
  • Remuneration from services rendered to users

Intangible asset model

The intangible asset model applies where the operator is paid by the users or where the concession grantor has not provided a contractual guarantee in respect of the amount recoverable. The intangible asset corresponds to the right granted by the concession grantor to the operator to charge users of the public service.

Intangible assets resulting from the application of this policy are recorded in the Balance Sheet under the heading ‘Concession intangible assets’ and are amortised, generally on a straight-line basis, over the contract term. However, fees paid to local authorities that are part of intangible costs are disclosed under item ‘Other intangible assets’.

Under the intangible asset model, Revenue includes:

  • revenue from the construction of the infrastructure;
  • operating revenue of the infrastructure.

Mixed model

The choice of the financial asset or intangible asset model depends on the existence of payment guarantees granted by the concession grantor. However, certain contracts may include a payment commitment on the part of the concession grantor covering only part of the investment, with the balance covered by royalties charged to users.

Where this is the case, the investment amount guaranteed by the concession grantor is recognised under the financial asset model and the residual balance is recognised under the intangible asset model.

Sample Disclosure – Accounting Policy Of Operating Segments Reporting (25 November 2010)

Operating Segments Reporting

Operating segments are reported in a manner consistent with the internal reporting provided to the chief operating decision-maker of the Group. The chief operating decision-maker of the Group, who is responsible for allocating resources and assessing performance of the operating segments, is the Chief Operating Officer (“COO”) of the Group who has the authority to make strategic decisions on the operations of the Group.

Sample Disclosure – Change In Accounting Policy, Measurement Of Stage Of Completion Of Contract Work (8 December 2009)

CHANGE IN ACCOUNTING POLICY – MEASUREMENT OF STAGE OF COMPLETION FOR CONTRACT WORK

Prior to 1 July 2008, where the outcome of a construction contract can be reliably estimated, contract revenue and contract costs are recognised as revenue and expenses respectively by using the stage of completion method. The stage of completion is measured by reference to the proportion of contract costs incurred for work performed to date to the estimated total contract costs.

However, the Company has changed the basis of measurement from proportion of contract costs incurred for work performed to date to the estimated total contract costs to survey of work performed. The reason for the change is that the directors are of the opinion that value of work certified or surveyed as a percentage of the total contract value better reflect the contract work performed by the Company. The change in accounting policy is applied retrospectively and there was no effect on the balance sheet items of the Company as at 30 June 2009 and the income statement of the Company for the financial year then ended.

Sample Disclosure – Share Based Employee Compensation Scheme, ESOS (25 November 2009)

Share-based Employee Compensation Scheme – ESOS

The Company’s Employee Share Options Scheme (“ESOS”) is a share-based, equity-settled employee compensation scheme. The ESOS allows the employees of the Company acquiring the shares of the Company upon fulfilling certain conditions.

The total fair value of share options granted employees is recognised as an employee costs in the income statement with the corresponding increase in the share option reserve in the equity section of the Company over the vesting period of the ESOS taking into account the probability that the ESOS will vest.

The fair value of ESOS is measured at Grant Date, taking into account, if relevant, the market vesting conditions upon which the options were granted but excluding the impact of any non-market vesting conditions. Non-market vesting conditions are included in the assumptions about the number of options that are expected to become exercisable on Vesting Date.

At each balance sheet date, the Company revises its estimates of the number of options that are expected to become exercisable on Vesting Date. It recognises the impact of the revision of the original estimates, if any, in the income statement, and a corresponding adjustment to equity over the remaining vesting period. The equity amount is recognised in the share option reserve until the option is exercised, upon which it will be transferred to share premium account, or until the option expires, it will be transferred to retained earnings of the Company.

The proceeds received net of any directly attributable transaction costs are credited to equity when the options are exercised.

Sample Disclosure – Accounting Policy Of Employee Equity Compensation Benefits (ESOS) (24 November 2009)

EMPLOYEE EQUITY COMPENSATION BENEFITS

The Employees’ Share Option Schemes (“ESOSs”) of the Company and a subsidiary grant the Group’s eligible employees options to subscribe for shares in the Company and the subsidiary at pre-determined subscription prices. These equity compensation benefits are recognised as an expense with a corresponding increase in equity over the vesting period as share option reserve. The total amount to be recognised is determined by reference to the fair value of the share options at grant date and the estimated number of share options expected to vest on vesting date.